Far Exceeded Expectations (FEE) - This rating is rarely achieved. Performance consistently far exceeded expectations in virtually all competencies and overall work was superior; work contributed to the overall success of the unit or the campus at large, with significant positive impact over time; and goals and assignments were consistently completed, on time or often earlier than anticipated. It is a best practice to include concrete examples of the staff member's contributions in the overall rating section.
Successfully Met Expectations (SME) - This rating covers overall effective performance. Performance consistently met expectations in virtually all competencies, the quality of work overall met expectations, and many goals and assignments were well executed and largely met on time. The employee is dependable, competent, and knowledgeable, and may have exceeded some expectations. It is best practice to include concrete examples of the staff member's contributions in the overall rating section.
Met Some Expectations (MSE) - Performance was adequate in some competencies, but needs improvement in one or more critical competencies. One or more of the most critical goals or assignments were not met. Work product requires improvement in one or more critical competencies to meet expectations. Concrete examples of the staff member's deficiencies must be included in the overall rating section. At the manager's discretion, a performance improvement plan may be outlined with timelines and monitored to measure progress. Review from HR is required.
Met Few Expectations (MFE) - Performance was unacceptable in one or more critical competencies that significantly hindered overall successful performance. Individual failed to make reasonable progress toward critical work assignment(s) or goal(s). Concrete examples of the staff member's deficiencies must be included in the overall rating section. A performance improvement plan must be outlined with timelines and monitored to measure progress. Review from HR is required.
